Click on the slide!

Ready

Articles >> Season 2009-2010

Read·i·ness n. The state or quality of being ready; preparation; promptness; aptitude; willingness   In the film Ocean’s 13 there is a cameo moment in which George Clooney is standing behind Andy Garcia looking into…

More...
Click on the slide!

Walter Smith and the Art of Convenience

Articles >> Season 2009-2010

On Friday night after enjoying my traditional fish tea (am I the über Tim or what?) I sat down to take in half an hour of Scotland today and the unintentionally hilarious presenting skills of messrs  John MacKay and Raman…

More...
Click on the slide!

Simple Questions

Articles >> Season 2009-2010

No-one is saying (well some may) that the SFA Referees are meeting in lodges, to decide how things are going to go in any future games. I know that’s not the case as far as I’m aware (sic).…

More...
Click on the slide!

Celtic Paranoia: Fraser Wishart and the Radio Clyde Rent-A-Huns

Celtic Paranoia >> Season 2009-2010

Fraser Wishart is an ex-Rangers player and chief executive of the Scottish Professional Footballers Association (SPFA). As such he is responsible for representing the interests of ALL professional players in Scotland. However, Wishart has demonstrated a curious selectiveness in the…

More...
Click on the slide!

How Would You Feel?

Articles >> Season 2009-2010

Imagine you are a contractor on a job. You turn up for work over a long period of time and try your best to get the job done. However, every time you are on the job, the supervisor treats you…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow (version 2.0.0) - Copyright © 2006-2008 by JoomlaWorks

CU Podcast

Books of the Month

March

February

Paddypower

January

Ready PDF Print E-mail
Written by Lachiemor   
Tuesday, 09 March 2010 19:23

Willie_McStayRead·i·ness n. The state or quality of being ready; preparation; promptness; aptitude; willingness

 

In the film Ocean’s 13 there is a cameo moment in which George Clooney is standing behind Andy Garcia looking into a mirror.  He puts the question: ‘Are you ready?’ to his erstwhile adversary, who replies, removing his shades as he does: ‘I was born ready!’

 

Clooney’s raised eyebrows as Garcia leaves the shot says everything that needs to be said about a response which is now so clichéd as to be hackneyed.

 

However it was in considering this humorous interchange that I was moved to reflect on what is meant by ‘ready’.

 

The dictionary definition which I offer suggests several features of what might be seen as readiness, not the least of which is - in my opinion - ‘aptitude’.

 

It is possible to prepare well, to be prompt and to be willing, but if a person or a group lacks the ability to carry out a given task then they cannot ever be ready.

 

(As an aside, it is worth commenting that our greatest rivals bear this boast on their never to be cracked crest – indeed in past times they used to be ‘Aye Ready’, but now they are simply ready.)

 

 
 
Walter Smith and the Art of Convenience PDF Print E-mail
Written by PAC   
Sunday, 07 March 2010 09:09

Smith_and_refOn Friday night after enjoying my traditional fish tea (am I the über Tim or what?) I sat down to take in half an hour of Scotland today and the unintentionally hilarious presenting skills of messrs  John MacKay and Raman Bhardwaj. On a side note it's an indication of what lame dross the once mighty 'Only An Excuse' has become when their pastiche of these ready made comic characters fails to raise more than a snigger, and even that's mostly due to the new year's cider. Anyway, I digress.

As I sat twiddling my fingers waiting for the end of the numbingly irrelevant reports on how Glasgow city councilor Steven Purcell had handed in his notice and fled the country, for I suspect secretly being the vet Paddy from 'Emmerdale', and sipping my tea I noticed that all of the paper talk was of Tony Mowbray's annoyance at the failure of Celtic's appeal against Scott Brown's sending off in last Sunday's match. So it was of no surprise that Raman's sporting headline was on that very topic and then we got to see the recording itself of an uncharacteristically animated Tony Mowbray from earlier that day no longer just 'taking it on the chin' and instead coming out all guns blazing on the subject. If you haven't had a chance to read or hear just what that was I will paste in the quote but please read on once you have:

Last Updated on Sunday, 07 March 2010 16:31
 
Celtic Paranoia: Fraser Wishart and the Radio Clyde Rent-A-Huns PDF Print E-mail
Written by Tony Bananas   
Sunday, 07 March 2010 20:10
Fraser Wishart is an ex-Rangers player and chief executive of the Scottish Professional Footballers Association (SPFA). As such he is responsible for representing the interests of ALL professional players in Scotland. However, Wishart has demonstrated a curious selectiveness in the cases which he chooses to highlight in the media.
Allow me to illustrate:
February 2008 - Celtic awarded a disputed free-kick against St Mirren. The Celtic player involved, Shunsuke Nakamura, is pilloried on radio phone-ins and TV, and newspapers carry headlines referring to Nakamura as "CON MAN" and "CHEAT"
Wishart makes no statement in the media.
March 2008 - Kevin Thomson of Rangers is bizarrely carried off after a pathetic attempt to win a penalty by throwing himself to the ground in the penalty area and deliberately making contact with Samaras with his trailing leg. Although the press coverage is almost universally sympathetic to the player, Wishart launches a vigorous defence of Thomson through comments which are enthusiastically published in the media.
One specific statement is of particular interest - "What I would say is that in many instances players lift themselves off the ground when they think the tackle is coming, then the tackle doesn't come". You may have already worked out where I am going with that one...
May 2008 - Fraser Wishart, a man paid as a trade union official under the umbrella of the GMB, actively supports a season extension, without consulting his members, even though it was against the interests of players from 11 of the 12 SPL club who pay his wages.
August 2008 - Rangers goal wrongly disallowed against Aberdeen (swoon!), prompting NoSurname into a mental (but dignified) rant against the officials including naming the suspiciously Irish-sounding Tom Murphy and helpfully pointing out that Murphy was the linesman who failed to flag Scott McDonald for being a nanometre offside for the first goal in the 3-2 win over Rangers a mere four months prior to this incident. Amid total outrage among the Scottish media, on Clyde 1 an Aberdeen fan phones in to point out that Rangers goal in the same game came from a free-kick which should never have been awarded. Wishart dismissed this, helpfully pointing out that "Aberdeen still had a chance to defend the free-kick". You know the kind of comment that he, or any of his poodle Establishment colleague failed to make when Celtic were awarded a disputed corner against Motherwell towards the end of the previous season which brought Darrell King to the point of an anuerysm.
August 2008 - Scott Brown, Aiden McGeady and Darren O'Dea are involved in a fracas in nightclub. Newspapers carry witness reports that "A few guys were winding them [the Celtic players] up but as the night went on it started getting nasty.... "The players started to leave but as McGeady got outside he was jumped by a gang who set about him". Curiously the newspapers seemed very reluctant to name the aggressors as Rangers fans, instead referring to them as "A few guys" and "a gang".
November 2008 - Aiden McGeady is attacked outside a nightclub. Despite reporting "It's believed[my emphasis] the 22-year-old Celtic winger was subjected to a volley of vile sectarian abuse by three cowardly yobs" and "There was about three of them and they started dishing out some abuse, it was pretty heavy stuff" and "It's understood they branded him a "Fenian b******" before landing two hefty blows", the Sun can't quite manage to identify whether they are Rangers supporters or not. Funny that. The Sun is also at pains to stress that Rangers players have also suffered at the hands of thuggery, with one having his car daubed with "Celtic slogans" [I guess it's a fair cop then] and another scandalously having his address published on the internet, Among all the subsequent anguish and gnashing of teeth among the Scottish media at these crimes ostensibly committed by Celtic fans, no-one feels the need to point out that none of the predicted violent attacks on the player's property came to pass. Hmmm, another strange one.
At no point in all of this does Fraser Wishart feel the need to decry Rangers fans and bemoan the inability of players to go out without being attacked for "the colour of jersey they wear on a Saturday". Maybe Wishart's concern was for tolerance of crimes against fashion
August 2009 - Aiden McGeady is sent off against Hibs for diving. Fraser Wishart is mysteriously absent with any public proclamations of support for the player along the lines of "What I would say is that in many instances players lift themselves off the ground when they think the tackle is coming, then the tackle doesn't come"
February 2010 - Fraser 'Judge Jury and Executioner' Wishart decries an “assault” on Rangers goalkeeper Alan McGregor “just for the jersey he wears”. Maybe he should be called as a witness as McGregor himself was reported to have told police he did not know what happened or even where.
Despite all this, no-one in the Scottish media has queried Wishart's role or, for example, his publicly disavowing the actions of his own members when they happen to play for Celtic. In any real trade union, he would have been dismissed.
Alan McGregor
The Alan McGregor case is another one that shows the staggering disparity in the Scottish Media's treatment of Celtic and the Establishment club. Now I am a pretty liberal guy and am a firm believer in "innocent until proven guilty". However the reluctance to address the allegations of sexual assault against this guy is very out of character for tabloids for whom this kind of stuff is their bread and butter. Any concern over prejudicing a trial simply doesn't wash when you consider the trash these low-lifes have published in the past.The sexual assault allegations have been roundly buried by the media and have been completely absent from discussion on the recent "assault" story.
It is not difficult to imagine the rainforests which would have been decimated over the past couple of months if Artur Boruc had been the subject of a similar complaint. The Daily Ranger/Hun etc would be digging up lapdancers, ex-girl friends and wee lassies from Poland who's pigtails he pulled when he was 6 years old to fill up front, middle and back pages of their rags with lurid stories. They would be demanding Celtic sack the player and he be made an example of.
Paranoia? Consider the front page splash in the Sun a few months ago accompanying a photo of Boruc straightening a woman's hair with a pair of hair straighteners. Some sort of sordid connotation was implied against the clearly depraved Celtic goalkeeper.
But in the case of McGregor... the rags print a photo of the CELTIC stadium in relation to the original sexual assault story, the whole thing is allowed to die within a couple of days, then weeks later when the player is again involved in an unsavoury incident, no links are made between the two events and his poor bird is blamed for everything. The press simply accept the implausible story put out to deflect attention from one of the Establishment team's prize assets, that no-one at all was responsible for the assault. Maybe McGregor is suffering from the same mental condition as Edward Norton's character in Fight Club.
Then of course we have Walter the Dignified One. After having made noises about McGregor being unfit/ having to buck his ideas up, Nosurname acts decisively to..er.. do nothing and keeps the errant player in his team for the game against Celtic. Such decisive and effective leadership skills as demonstrated by the Hun manager with Nosurname being absent from Celtic Park when it came to McGeady who was actually dropped from the team after conflict with the manager. No, in that case Strachan was out of order and the player was a niggly wee shite. In fact, in their glee the Scottish media couldn't make their minds up who they wanted to put the boot into more, although I reckon Strachan shaded it with the "Strachan Out if Celtic lose the next game even though they're top of the league" stories. Anyway, consider the logic applied to each case and try to work it out.
Billy McNeill
Radio Clyde - caller berates Billy McNeill for having the viewpoint that decisions have went against Celtic for 50 years, caller is cut off as he start to get abusive.
McGuire responds
"Billy is a legend, and he is allowed an opinion, its just that an opinion"
Big Fat Derek adds
"every team gets decisions against them, but its just honest mistakes, I got a penalty against me in the 77 cup final, the ball hit my thigh, not my arm, and the referee gave a penalty, wrongly, and to be honest, I had forgotten about it 5 days later, I didnt go on about it"
OK so you're not mentioning it 33 years later then Derek, and thats the first time you have mentioned it since 5 days after the final? Utter pish. I am not old enough to have watched this game live, but am well aware of the circumstances surrounding it as every time Celtic and the Huns are involved in a cup final, Johnstone is wheeled out to whinge on about the penalty that never was contrary to the evidence of everyone else's eyes. As an fair minded person would tell you fatso, the ball hit your arm.
Anyway, one decision against them in 33 years. They've got it hard. Next they'll be on about a dodgy corner we got in 1965.
Walter's schizophrenia
Wattie the Cardigan says Rangers were let down by the referee on Sunday and they should have had a penalty for Hinkel not doffing his cap and saying "after you m'lud" to Edu. Is this the same Cardigan who said the referee had a good game? I think we have some selective memory problems for the soon to be pensioner. So if he is so concerned about the poor refereeing, and being such a dignified guy and all that, will he be doing the decent thing and say he is supporting Celtic in their appeal of Scott Brown's red card? Thought not.

Wishart_hunFraser Wishart is an ex-Rangers player and chief executive of the Scottish Professional Footballers Association (SPFA). As such he is responsible for representing the interests of ALL professional players in Scotland. However, Wishart has demonstrated a curious selectiveness in the cases which he chooses to highlight in the media. 

Allow me to illustrate:

February 2008 - Celtic awarded a disputed free-kick against St Mirren. The Celtic player involved, Shunsuke Nakamura, is pilloried on radio phone-ins and TV, and newspapers carry headlines referring to Nakamura as "CON MAN" and "CHEAT"

Wishart makes no statement in the media.March 2008 - Kevin Thomson of Rangers is bizarrely carried off after a pathetic attempt to win a penalty by throwing himself to the ground in the penalty area and deliberately making contact with Samaras with his trailing leg. Although the press coverage is almost universally sympathetic to the player, Wishart launches a vigorous defence of Thomson through comments which are enthusiastically published in the media.

One specific statement is of particular interest - "What I would say is that in many instances players lift themselves off the ground when they think the tackle is coming, then the tackle doesn't come". You may have already worked out where I am going with that one...

 

Last Updated on Sunday, 07 March 2010 20:14
 
Simple Questions PDF Print E-mail
Written by Napoleon   
Sunday, 07 March 2010 19:21

jvoh_shoutNo-one is saying (well some may) that the SFA Referees are meeting in lodges, to decide how things are going to go in any future games. I know that’s not the case as far as I’m aware (sic).

 

I’m miles away from that, as it doesn't need to be as calculated as that.

 

Here's what I'm saying.

 

The SFA refereeing hierarchy, this doesn't include the currently active Referees, are influencing said active Referees in the way they should be applying the 'Rules of Football' to the Scottish game.

 

 

 
How Would You Feel? PDF Print E-mail
Written by JS   
Friday, 05 March 2010 21:31
How would you feel?
Imagine you are a contractor on a job. You turn up for work over a long period of time and try your best to get the job done. However, every time you are on the job, the supervisor treats you differently. You cannot quite put your finger on why, but you are aware that you are constantly penalised for work, that is of the same standard or better than the various other contractors.
The other contractors constantly cut corners and produce shoddy work, which impacts directly on what you do, but it does not seem to register in the mind of the supervisor. He either does not notice or chooses to ignore their failings. However, if your own standards slip, you are immediately criticised, and worse, get penalised to a far harsher level than the others.
Now, when you took the job on, you knew it would be hard, you were getting paid far more than the other contractors, and you recognised and accepted that. The supervisor would, you were told, be a lot less lenient with you, but you accepted it was all part of the deal. Your only expectation was that it would be a level playing field, and the supervisor would be fair and honest in his dealings with you.
So, when this happens repeatedly, how do you react, how long before you begin to get demoralised by that treatment? You are getting the big money, so onlookers tell you to get on with it. You’re on the big bucks, so suck it up and show you are better than them. After all, that is why you are getting the money. No sympathy to be had here, just do the job you are paid for.
So now apply this same logic to any player currently playing in the first team squad for Celtic. They are the big cheeses of the SPL, on the big money and carrying that full weight of expectation. Their sponsors, the season book holders, cannot accept that the constant provocation of the supervisor of their job, the referee, can possibly affect them. Not to mention the constant moans at even the slightest dip below the expectations they have for them. However, they are only human and no amount of cash at the end of the week helps them cope with the lack of a level playing field, and the often unrealistic expectations of the sponsors.
Can you honestly say that you could cope with this, without it affecting you? How long before it wears you down to a weary acceptance. This is how things are, so what is the point of fighting it? It is how things are in this league, and other than wishing you were elsewhere, there is very little you can do. Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not invoking some plea to feel sorry for them, but I do think we need to have a good hard look at how it impacts on their mental state and confidence.
Most of these guys have never experienced anything like this. They are football players, who expect to be given the facilities and on field protection to use their god given abilities to play the game. Something denied them simply because they have chosen to play for Celtic. Look at the expression on the face of Andy Hinkel, when penalised for a non existent foul on Kenny Miller in the second half of Sunday’s game. It is a look of bewilderment. He quite simply, cannot believe it.
As a Celtic fan, not only are you aware of how it is, you most likely half expect it. After all, it has always been so. You carry this feeling with you and would give every ounce of your being to be in a position to do something about it.
These guys do not carry that same burden. They cannot possibly have the same feeling as you, as they were not born into this.  Sure they might have heard it suggested, but now they are living it, in each and every game they have played in Scotland this season. They may even, as others have in the past, eventually share your passion, but not at this juncture in their fledgling Celtic careers.
This cannot and does not excuse some of the dreadfully poor performances this season, but it cannot be ignored. To look at performances in isolation, without taking the whole picture into account, is quite simply unfair.
Some talk of a lack of spine or bottle, but do not forget, that any attempt to fight back, is immediately met with the upmost contempt or hostility. You need look no further than Sunday for evidence of that. Look at the sending off. Was that not merely retaliation for him having the temerity to question a decision before hand? How many players this season have been booked for daring to suggest that their treatment was not merited?  For instance, the Keane welcome to Scotland yellow card against Dundee United.
Look at the reaction created last week by the media, at the very suggestion that Celtic would dare to ask questions about the validity of earlier decisions? Can these players ever believe that they would be able to speak honestly, or even more fight their corner? I think not.
So before you start venting your spleen directly at the players, or banging it out on your keyboard, give a little thought for those players and the position they find themselves in. Not sympathy, but a bit more understanding, of the circumstances that are affecting them, and the impact that is likely to have on them.
They may not turn out to be the best ever to represent the hoops, but without your support and the benefit of at least a semblance of fair play, there is no chance that we will ever honestly be able to judge it.
Hail Hail

brown2Imagine you are a contractor on a job. You turn up for work over a long period of time and try your best to get the job done. However, every time you are on the job, the supervisor treats you differently. You cannot quite put your finger on why, but you are aware that you are constantly penalised for work, that is of the same standard or better than the various other contractors.

The other contractors constantly cut corners and produce shoddy work, which impacts directly on what you do, but it does not seem to register in the mind of the supervisor. He either does not notice or chooses to ignore their failings. However, if your own standards slip, you are immediately criticised, and worse, get penalised to a far harsher level than the others.

Last Updated on Saturday, 06 March 2010 17:50
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 7

Login Form

Due to the move to the new site all previous users will need to create new accounts. Sorry.



Who's Online

We have 50 guests online

Newsletter

Sign up for our monthly newsletter and get all our articles sent to your inbox.




RocketTheme Joomla Templates